can you please write the research proposal for me I will provide you with the instructions. so my topic is Employment Reintegration Challenges for Sex Offenders and for the research proposal we need 3 primary and one secondary source and I have already found the sources I will attach the links. Primary sources- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00452.x, https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2022.2158983, https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2030736 and 1 secondary source https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219884588. just search the URL on google and it will direct to the sources. Just read the sources and write the research proposal and how to write the proposal I am attaching a example what the pattern should be Witness testimony is critical to the operation of our court system. However, the process only works properly if the testimony given is relevant and accurate. Therefore, in witness testimony it is extremely important to not only ask relevant questions but also for the context of the questions to be made clear to the witness. In cases of eye-witness testimony, the witness may not remember the event clearly, and they may remember something that did not take place or even something that is contrary to the actual event that took place. This problem of a lack of proper recall in eye-witness testimony has been shown to only be compounded by confusing and complex questions, as well as questions asked in the negative (Henderson & Buries, 2014, p. 25). These issues are then intensified if the witness that is testifying has an intellectual disability. Courts can be very intimidating, even for the average person, so when a witness with a learning disability or the emotional survivor of a sexual assault case is questioned their answering can be extremely muddled and unreliable. A study conducted by Kebbell, Hatton and Johnson has indicated that "lawyers are not altering their questioning behavior for witnesses with intellectual disabilities, either positively or negatively" (2004, p. 33) and that those with intellectual disabilities are more likely to give shorter accounts and agree with leading questions. Further, their study also concludes that the ways that witnesses are examined, especially in cross-examination, "does little to ensure that their memories are as accurate as possible" (Kebbell et al., 2004, p. 33). In a newer study, Kebbell, Evans and Johnson were able to conclude that not only were eye-witness testimonies more accurate when simpler questions were asked but also that a selection of mock jurors had greater confidence in the testimony when the questions asked were less complex. Most of the jurors cited reaction time as the biggest factor in their decision of the accuracy of the witness as well as, to a much lesser extent, tone of voice and eye movement (2010, pp. 266-267). These factors affecting juror decisions are then made even more evident when a person with a learning disability is testifying. A number of researchers have found that the kind of language and questioning that lawyers tend to use in court can come across as confusing for eyewitnesses, and as such would be even more difficult to interpret for the witnesses who have a learning disability (Kebbell & Johnson, 2000; Kebbell, Hatton, Johnson & O'Kelly, 2001; Danet, 1980; Kebbell et al., 2010; Kebbell & Gilles, 2000; Henderson & Buries, 2014). For example, Kebbell and Johnson point out that when a witness is asked a question in the negative, asked a question using a double negative or asked a leading question, they are much less likely to answer accurately than if they were asked a much more simplified version. (2000, pp. 634-635) This research is focused on whether lawyers are generally aware of the problems of eye witness testimony and the effects that negative, double negative, leading and confusing questions have on the general population, especially those of which are intellectually disabled. In addition, this research proposal focuses on how and when lawyers would use these strategies and how, if ever, they would simplify or change their line of questioning when interrogating the intellectually disabled. please make sure that it should look like this and should be like two page.