can you reply to a class mates discussion post, at least 60 words long disagree that it is in the best interest of the citizens in the U.S. to have the Supreme Court act quickly and decisively to interpret the law in light of new social situations. If the Supreme Court is beholden to the mistakes they have made in the past when interpreting the law, it should use these past endeavors as a guide when interpreting the law in light of new social situations. When the Supreme Court is interpreting a law, as a reference, the Courts can be held to a higher standard by expecting them to take time to examine the mistakes through interpretations. In doing so, we the people of the U.S., can assure we have a competent Supreme Court that diligently takes the time to consider interpretations of the law in light of new social situations. Doing so assures the Supreme Court will not make the same mistake twice. For example, in the case of Brown v. the Board of Education, the Supreme Court put an end to the legal segregation of white and black students. This would be a good reference because it showcases how equality and civil rights were not protected, and violated the 14th Amendment in the U.S. Constitution