can you rewrite this paragraph more simple "A primary analysis will look at whether tarot-specific content affects decision confidence and insight more than a matched control, and whether prior belief in the paranormal moderates these effects. A secondary study will also explore whether the observed effects vary based on how familiar you are with tarot and whether your cognitive style changes. We'll use it to understand how tarot-specific content interacts with belief systems and cognitive processes. If the data support it, we'll fit linear mixed-effects models with random intercepts for participants and random slopes for conditions: Outcome = 0 + 1(Condition) + 2(Time: pre/post) + 3(Belief) + 4(Condition Belief) + covariates (order, affect change) + random effects. If only post-reading outcomes are used, we'll look at condition as a within-subject factor and belief as a continuous moderator. We'll use restricted maximum likelihood to estimate models; diagnostic plots will show if assumptions (normality of residuals, homoscedasticity) are violated. We'll use robust regression (HC3/HC4 sandwich SEs) or ordinal mixed models for Likert outcomes. The effect sizes are reported as standardized mean differences for within-subjects (dz) and semi-partial R2s for fixed effects, with 95% CIs. The false discovery rate (Benjamini-Hochberg) controls Type I error