cap was $\backslash (\backslash$$ $12\backslash )$ million even though it experienced a loss, or negative net income, of $\backslash (\backslash$$ $2\mathrm{.}5\backslash )$ million. Logistics paid no dividends during the year. Was the analyst's prediction correct? Explain.

The total rate of return for the firm is $\backslash (\backslash$qquad $\backslash )\backslash \%.($Round to two decimal places.$)$

Did the analyst's prediction prove correct? $($Select the best answer below.$)$

A$.$ No$,$ the analyst's prediction is incorrect because the firm had a lower total rate of return than the one the analyst predicted.

B$.$ Yes, the analyst's prediction is correct because the firm's total rate of return is even higher than the predicted one regardless of the negative net income.

C$.$ No$,$ the analyst's prediction is incorrect because the firm had a negative net income even though its total rate of return is higher the predicted one.

D$.$ Yes, the analyst's prediction is correct because the firm's negative net income was fully recovered by the positive annual rate of return.