Cardi Cee sued her public school system $($AISD$)$ claiming a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. She claims that she was treated differently at her school because of her gender. Cardi Cee was able to show the court that her treatment was due to a school policy that required different testing for men and women. AISD responded that it had important reasons for doing so and that it was in the very best interest of all students. The judge held that AISD had only displayed a rational basis, somewhat related to the unequal treatment. Which of the following is most likely the result of the court$$s analysis?

Group of answer choices

None of these

AISD is not part of the government so the court would likely throw the case out

Rule for the plaintiff as the testing violates the Supremacy Clause

Rule for the defendant as the testing violates the Equal Protection Clause

Rule for the defendant as they met their burden of proof