Case $22\mathrm{.}3$ is In re Chamberlain. In that case a married couple went through a divorce. The divorce agreement stated the husband would contribute towards the children's college education. When the former husband went through bankruptcy, he attempted to have the obligation to provide college support to his children discharged. Did he win his case? $\_\_\_\_\_($Yes $/$ No$,$ the court ruled the obligation was a domestic support order and could not be discharged in bankruptcy$)$

Case Example $22\mathrm{.}7$ discusses a situation in which a woman had a loan requiring $48$ payments. After she made $13$ payments she missed a payment and filed for bankruptcy that same month. She then made a payment shortly after filing for bankruptcy and after that she signed a reaffirmation agreement with the bank to pay off the loan. She believed the payment she had missed before filing bankruptcy had been discharged in bankruptcy. Was it$?\_\_\_\_\_($Yes$,$ the court ruled a reaffirmation agreement is not binding until approved by the bankruptcy court $/$ No$,$ the reaffirmation agreement she signed restored the original agreement$)$

Case $22\mathrm{.}2-$ In re Dykes $-$ involved a married couple who were both surgeons. They lived in a $$3$ million home and lived a very luxurious lifestyle. They filed for bankruptcy and were upset when their attempt to be granted a bankruptcy discharge was denied on grounds they had not provided sufficient documentation of their assets that had been allegedly lost or given to their children. Did the appellate court rule the denial of bankruptcy was proper? $\_\_\_\_\_($Yes$,$ the appellate court agreed with the bankruptcy court $/$ No$,$ the appellate court ruled the trustee and bankruptcy judge abused their power by denying the bankruptcy discharge to this couple$)$