Case 2: NOT RETURNING to Hoike Hotel In the case below you will determine if there is/are significant dependency/dependencies hotels and reasons NOT to return then state where the dependency is based on the randomized data. The level of significance is at .05. Answer the Question: What recommendation would you offer to Hoike Hotel's marketing manager regarding Room Quality2 (25 Points) Reasons for NOT RETURNING to Hawaii Hotel Observed Frequencies Column variable Primary Reason for The Grand NOT RETURNING Hawaian Ohana Inn Holke Hotel Amenities 24 9 35 Dining 4 13 Room Quality 60 14 8 Service 15 10 8 Total 93 37 64 Total 68 31 62 33 194 Data Calculations Level of Significance 0.05 Number of Rows 4 fo-fe Number of Columns 3 -8.598 -3.969 12.567 6 0.861 1.912 2.7732 Degrees of Freedom 10.278 2.1753 -12.45 -0.82 3.7062 -2.887 Results Critical Value 12.59158724 Chi-Square Test Statis 26.47050237 p-Value 1.82E-04 Reject the null hypothesis fro-fel-2/ 2.2678 1.2147 7.0401 Expected frequency assumption 0.0499 0.6186 0.752 is met. 3.5545 0.4002 7.5806 0.0425 2.1824 0.7654 T Expected frequencies Column voble Primary Reason for The Grand NOT RETURNING Hawaiian Ohana in Holke Hotel Amnes 32.59793814 12.960072222.4329897 14 6082474 5.91237113 10.2268041 on 29.22164948 11.824742320.4536082 Serv15.819587637 6.29381443 10.8865979 93 37 68 31 33 194