Case #2: The First Amendment: The Case of the Perplexed Pacifist For several years, Nick worked in the nonmilitary operations of a large private firm named Zenco, located in Nevada, that produced military and non-military goods. Nick is a Quaker and a pacifist and does not believe in war or taking a human life, no matter what the circumstances. Nick has kept his religious beliefs to himself and has not discussed these beliefs with co-workers, supervisors or the management of Zenco. Recently, Nick was transferred to Zenco's plant that produces military goods. Shortly after being transferred to Zenco's military operations facility, Nick voluntarily quit his job and then sued Zenco, claiming that Zenco violated his 1st Amendment right to exercise his religious beliefs and that Zenco violated his religious principles by transferring him to a company plant that produces military goods that are used to take human life. Does Nick have a claim against Zenco under the 1st Amendment? Why or why not