case brief: can you please find the issue, Rule, Application and conclusion. i will leave a thumb up. Thank you

331 S.W.3d 600 (Ky. 2010) American Greetings Corp. v. Bunch An employee, Shella Bunch, injured her knee in a relay race while participating in a fundraising event for United Way, in her company cafete ria. The race was in the company cafeteria during her unpaid lunch hour. The employer, American Greetings Corp, sponsored a month-long fundraising campaign each year. Employee participation was voluntary with no penalties for not participating Employees promoted the event (posting flyers on company bulletin boards, for example), both on and off the clock. The company donated prizes for the fundraising events, some of which were held on company property during work hours. The company encouraged employees to participate. It paid them to attend a one hour presentation, and for employees who chose to donate, it deducted those contributions from employee paychecks. The Kentucky Court of Appeals ruled that the injury was within the scope of employment and therefore the employee was entitled to work ers' compensation benefits). The employer appealed that decision, urging the Kentucky Supreme Court to find that the injury was outside the scope of employment. The court refers at some points to the administrative bodies that considered the case originally, the ML (administrative law Judge) and the Board" (the state Worker's Compensation Board). 331 S.W.3d 600 (Ky. 2010) American Greetings Corp. v. Bunch An employee, Shella Bunch, injured her knee in a relay race while participating in a fundraising event for United Way, in her company cafete ria. The race was in the company cafeteria during her unpaid lunch hour. The employer, American Greetings Corp, sponsored a month-long fundraising campaign each year. Employee participation was voluntary with no penalties for not participating Employees promoted the event (posting flyers on company bulletin boards, for example), both on and off the clock. The company donated prizes for the fundraising events, some of which were held on company property during work hours. The company encouraged employees to participate. It paid them to attend a one hour presentation, and for employees who chose to donate, it deducted those contributions from employee paychecks. The Kentucky Court of Appeals ruled that the injury was within the scope of employment and therefore the employee was entitled to work ers' compensation benefits). The employer appealed that decision, urging the Kentucky Supreme Court to find that the injury was outside the scope of employment. The court refers at some points to the administrative bodies that considered the case originally, the ML (administrative law Judge) and the Board" (the state Worker's Compensation Board)