CASE II Jack buys a ticket to catch the bus to New York. He also buys two bags to put his personal belongings. He gives the big bag to the driver of the bus to drop it in the lower part of the vehicle with the other bags of other passengers. He kept the small suitcase with him because he kept cash and identity cards in this bag and he wanted to leave it under his close watch. Once in New York, he realizes that his little suitcase has disappeared. in panic he ran to the driver to ask to help him find his small suitcase because, according to Jack. the bus driver is responsible for the loss of his bag. The driver goes with Jack to the bus section where the big bags were dropped, he asked Jack to pick up his big suitcase and once it's recovered, he tells him that he cannot do anything for the other lost suitcase. Furious, Jack threatens to prosecute him and his company in Justice. 6- DESCRIBE THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JACK AND THE BUS DRIVER. (1 point) 7- WHAT ARE THE ARTICLES OF THE CCQ THAT GOVERN THIS LEGAL RELATIONSHIP AND IN PARTICULAR, WHICH GOVERN THE HIGHLIGHTS AND RELEVANT FACTS OF THIS STORY? (3 POINTS) 8- BASED ON THESE LEGAL ARTICLES, CAN YOU PREDICT (WITH LEGAL ARGUMENTS) WHO WILL WIN IN THE EVENT OF A COMPLAINT IN COURTS, LODGED BY JACK AGAINST THE DRIVER OF THE BUS AND HIS COMPANY? (2 POINTS)