case is in 2 pics

case 6

when he sold the land to the city? Is there any other basis on which the Society might win the case? 6. Cloudy Hill Road runs through a part of the Town of Trent Valley. The plaintiffs consist of a number of people who own cottages that are located immediately to the east of Cloudy Hill Road. The defendant is Fall River Farms Inc, which owns a large farm immediately to the west of Cloudy Hill Road. The defendant also owns the land on which Cloudy Hill Road runs. The road has fallen into a very bad condition. The town has announced that the road requires significant upgrades. The plaintiffs are willing to contribute to the cost of repairs. but only if they have legally enforceable rights to use the road in order to get to their cottages. (Another road exists for that purpose, but it is very inconvenient to use.) The defendant, in contrast, refuses to pay a cent toward road repairs, and they lave announced that they no longer are willing to allow the plantiffs to use the road free of change. The defendant's lawyer recently delivered a letter to each of the cottage oyners. The important part of the letter says, In exchange for a fee of $10000. Fall River Farms he will gratt perminsion to you and your immediate family to use Clotdy Hill koad for 50 years. The roud may be uxed for peronal purposes only, and the rights acquired under this agremient cannot be transerred to any other person: The plainteff argae that the defendant's position is unlawful, unrealistic, and unfair. They porit out that they (and the previotis owner of the cottages) have used Clondy Hill Ruad for at leat fo yearo T Paring that time. the defendiat Hover used the roal for its oxn putposes. never aked the plaimiffs to pay a fee and nevor eyen complained that the pluntitk were thing Cloudy Hill Road to access their cottages. (It tho is true that Fall River Farms tho neyer setually gave the eottagers permis- whith Clondy Hill Road rune The rad has fallem inta a very bad condition. The town has announced that the road requires significant upgrades. The plaintifis are wiling to contribute ro the eost of npaire, har anly if they have legally enforceable rights to use the road in order to get to their cottages. (Another road exists for that purpose, but it is very inconvenient to use.) The defendant, in contrast, refuses to pay a cent toward road repairs, and they have annotnced that they no longer are willing to allow the plaintiffs to the the road free of charge. The defendant's lawyer recently delivered a letter to each of the cottage owners. The important part of the letter says, "In exchange for a fee of $10000. Fall River Farms Ine will grant permission to you and your immediate family to use Cloudy Hill Road for 50 years. The road may be used lor personal purperes only, and the rights acquired tumeder this agrecment cannot be trathferred to amy odher person: "The plaintifs apgaie that the defendant is position 15 turianful, unfededstic, and timfiur. They point out that they (and the prefioun cowmers of the cottages) hiave used Clotrdy Hall Roud for at least Ath years. During that Litmer the defendant thever wed the ruad for tf -own purpores, Eoritplaned that the platintitt were thamr Chotidy Hill Farams tide? What in likety to happen it that offer 12 not cictophede Fiplam youth atswer. when he sold the land to the city? Is there any other basis on which the Society might win the case? 6. Cloudy Hill Road runs through a part of the Town of Trent Valley. The plaintiffs consist of a number of people who own cottages that are located immediately to the east of Cloudy Hill Road. The defendant is Fall River Farms Inc, which owns a large farm immediately to the west of Cloudy Hill Road. The defendant also owns the land on which Cloudy Hill Road runs. The road has fallen into a very bad condition. The town has announced that the road requires significant upgrades. The plaintiffs are willing to contribute to the cost of repairs. but only if they have legally enforceable rights to use the road in order to get to their cottages. (Another road exists for that purpose, but it is very inconvenient to use.) The defendant, in contrast, refuses to pay a cent toward road repairs, and they lave announced that they no longer are willing to allow the plantiffs to use the road free of change. The defendant's lawyer recently delivered a letter to each of the cottage oyners. The important part of the letter says, In exchange for a fee of $10000. Fall River Farms he will gratt perminsion to you and your immediate family to use Clotdy Hill koad for 50 years. The roud may be uxed for peronal purposes only, and the rights acquired under this agremient cannot be transerred to any other person: The plainteff argae that the defendant's position is unlawful, unrealistic, and unfair. They porit out that they (and the previotis owner of the cottages) have used Clondy Hill Ruad for at leat fo yearo T Paring that time. the defendiat Hover used the roal for its oxn putposes. never aked the plaimiffs to pay a fee and nevor eyen complained that the pluntitk were thing Cloudy Hill Road to access their cottages. (It tho is true that Fall River Farms tho neyer setually gave the eottagers permis- whith Clondy Hill Road rune The rad has fallem inta a very bad condition. The town has announced that the road requires significant upgrades. The plaintifis are wiling to contribute ro the eost of npaire, har anly if they have legally enforceable rights to use the road in order to get to their cottages. (Another road exists for that purpose, but it is very inconvenient to use.) The defendant, in contrast, refuses to pay a cent toward road repairs, and they have annotnced that they no longer are willing to allow the plaintiffs to the the road free of charge. The defendant's lawyer recently delivered a letter to each of the cottage owners. The important part of the letter says, "In exchange for a fee of $10000. Fall River Farms Ine will grant permission to you and your immediate family to use Cloudy Hill Road for 50 years. The road may be used lor personal purperes only, and the rights acquired tumeder this agrecment cannot be trathferred to amy odher person: "The plaintifs apgaie that the defendant is position 15 turianful, unfededstic, and timfiur. They point out that they (and the prefioun cowmers of the cottages) hiave used Clotrdy Hall Roud for at least Ath years. During that Litmer the defendant thever wed the ruad for tf -own purpores, Eoritplaned that the platintitt were thamr Chotidy Hill Farams tide? What in likety to happen it that offer 12 not cictophede Fiplam youth atswer