Question: Case Problem Analysis: Business Ethics Jackson Grey owns a commercial bakery in Blakely, Georgia that produces a variety of goods sold in grocery stores. Grey
Case Problem Analysis: Business Ethics
Jackson Grey owns a commercial bakery in Blakely, Georgia that produces a variety of goods sold in grocery stores. Grey is required by law to perform internal tests on food produced at his plant to check for contamination. During one threemonth period, three tests of food products containing peanut butter were positive for salmonella contamination. Grey was not legally required to report the results to US Food and Drug Administration officials, so he did not. Instead, Grey instructed his employees to repeat the tests until the results were negative. Meanwhile, the products that had originally tested positive for salmonella eventually were shipped out to retailers. Five people who ate Greys baked goods that year became seriously ill, and one person died from a salmonella infection.
There are four different aspects of a decision that a business should evaluate in order to maximize profits and be a good corporate citizen. In evaluating the first of the four factors, Grey should determine whether his failure to report the results to the Food and Drug Administration is a violation of
select answer
In this case, Grey
select answer
have a legal duty to perform internal tests on food produced at his plant to check for contamination. Grey
select answer
have a legal duty to report the initial test results to the US Food and Drug Administration. Merely complying with the law is known as the
select answer
Assessment question
In evaluating the second factor, Grey should analyze what the
select answer
might say if the shipped food caused sickness or death. Knowingly or recklessly allowing someone to become sick from the food because the company continued to test the food until the salmonella test was negative
select answer
be a public relations problem. In evaluating the third factor, Grey would look at the
select answer
for consumers and employees. Greys instructions to repeat the tests until the results were negative,
select answer
support the health and safety of consumers.
Assessment question
To assess the fourth factor, Grey should evaluate how much it might
select answer
the company to continue to test until the salmonella result is negative. Greys approach to profits in making this decision seems to be
select answer
profit maximization. In this case, Grey should consider not just the
select answer
of testing, but also the
select answer
of potential lawsuits or settlements.
Assessment question
In evaluating the four factors, it seems that Greys decision was
select answer
If Grey had thought through his options as if all food manufacturers would make the same decision, he would be applying
select answer
If Grey had analyzed his options using
select answer
he would have evaluated the costs and benefits of each option to determine the
select answer
for the
select answer
and most likely
select answer
shipped the food.
Assessment question
What If the Facts Were Different?
To address the widespread and growing concern of contaminated food causing serious injury and death to individuals throughout the United States, Congress passed a law stating that anyone intentionally distributing contaminated food is subject to criminal prosecution, civil fines, or both. Congress included a provision that any company with a corporate food safety compliance policy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration FDA would avoid criminal prosecution, but not civil fines. To be approved, the company policy must require the company to report to FDA any test results that indicate salmonella is present and consult with that agency before shipping any possibly contaminated food.
Grey wants to evaluate the outcome for all stakeholders to inform his decision making. Grey first should consider
select answer
to determine the legal and ethical issues related to implementing a corporate food safety compliance policy. After the initial step, Grey should list his possible actions related to the new law and evaluate each option for
select answer
Using the information from the first two steps, Grey should work with his staff to come to a consensus and develop a plan of action. Because Grey has used the stakeholder theory to inform his decision making, he has evaluated the protentional outcome for:
select answer
select answer
select answer
as well as
select answer
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
