case study 11: inappropriate client behavior

you think Discussion Questions 1. What are the facts in this situation? 2. Dr. Monitor volunteered to reduce his privileges. Does this event consti- tute a disciplinary action? Is this required to be reported to the physician licensing board 3. What obligations, if any, does the Chairperson have to report this to other hospitals where Dr. Monitor has privileges? 4. If Dr. Monitor had been a difficult personality to deal with, do the Chairperson of surgery would have proceeded in the same manner? What type of communications do you think might have occurred in that scenario? Provide your reflections and personal opinions as well as your rationale for your responses. 5. Physician credentialing and privileging is a duty of the hospital Board of Trustees (BOT). The BOT delegates this responsibility to physician experts on the hospital staff. If the quality committee and the Chairperson of surgery had not done their jobs, what might the repercussions have patients and for the hospital? Provide your reflections and per- sonal opinions as well as your rationale for your responses. Discussion Questions 1. What are the facts in this situation? 2. Should anyone who observed the behavior feel obligated to report it? Why do you think only female members reported the behavior? 3. Is this a criminal activity and should it be reported to police? CASE 11 INAPPROPRIATE CLIENT BEHAVIOR 43 4. Should the club install video surveillance equipment to deter this and other inappropriate member behaviors? Provide a rationale for your response. 5. Do you think this situation was handled properly? If yes, what were three things that were done right? If no, what do you think should have been donc differently? Provide a rationale for your response. 6. How could these types of behaviors be prevented in the future? Provide your reflections and personal opinions as well as your recommendations and rationale for what, if anything, might have been done differently in this case. you think Discussion Questions 1. What are the facts in this situation? 2. Dr. Monitor volunteered to reduce his privileges. Does this event consti- tute a disciplinary action? Is this required to be reported to the physician licensing board 3. What obligations, if any, does the Chairperson have to report this to other hospitals where Dr. Monitor has privileges? 4. If Dr. Monitor had been a difficult personality to deal with, do the Chairperson of surgery would have proceeded in the same manner? What type of communications do you think might have occurred in that scenario? Provide your reflections and personal opinions as well as your rationale for your responses. 5. Physician credentialing and privileging is a duty of the hospital Board of Trustees (BOT). The BOT delegates this responsibility to physician experts on the hospital staff. If the quality committee and the Chairperson of surgery had not done their jobs, what might the repercussions have patients and for the hospital? Provide your reflections and per- sonal opinions as well as your rationale for your responses. Discussion Questions 1. What are the facts in this situation? 2. Should anyone who observed the behavior feel obligated to report it? Why do you think only female members reported the behavior? 3. Is this a criminal activity and should it be reported to police? CASE 11 INAPPROPRIATE CLIENT BEHAVIOR 43 4. Should the club install video surveillance equipment to deter this and other inappropriate member behaviors? Provide a rationale for your response. 5. Do you think this situation was handled properly? If yes, what were three things that were done right? If no, what do you think should have been donc differently? Provide a rationale for your response. 6. How could these types of behaviors be prevented in the future? Provide your reflections and personal opinions as well as your recommendations and rationale for what, if anything, might have been done differently in this case