CASE STUDY $(29$Oct $2022)$

SEOUL $-$At least $153$people were killed in a crush when a huge crowd celebrating Halloween surged into an alley in a nightlife area of the South Korean capital Seoul on Saturday night, emergency officials said. Most of those who died were said to be teenagers and people in their $20$s$.$Authorities said $22$foreigners were killed, including those from Iran, Uzbekistan, China and Norway.

At least a further $133$people were injured in the melee in Seoul$$s Itaewon district, Mr Choi Sung$-$beom, head of the Yongsan Fire Station, said in a briefing at the scene. Nineteen of the injured were in serious condition and receiving emergency treatment, the officials said, adding the death toll could rise.It was the first Halloween event in Seoul in three years after the country lifted Covid$-19$restrictions and social distancing. Many of the partygoers were wearing masks and Halloween costumes. Some witnesses described the crowd becoming increasingly unruly and agitated as the evening deepened. The incident took place at about $10\mathrm{.}20$pm $(9\mathrm{.}20$pm Singapore time$).$

$$A number of people fell during a Halloween festival, and we have a large number of casualties,$$Mr Choi said. Many of those killed were near a nightclub.

Adapted from guardian.com

Hi help me find on Itaewon Disaster $2022$please$,$ need to do own research;

Review of the existing BCRM practices$/$regulations adopted by

Company$/$Companies and Government Agencies. $($Hint: you can refer to newspaper articles and other information revealed by the investigation report to identify relevant Business Continuity Risk Management practices$/$regulations$.$

Need to identify $5$practices$/$regulations adopt by them before the Itaewon Disaster happened that on the day of the event, there were no such practices measures implemented.