Case Study 2 A leader in the Aboriginal community and his family were camping, practicing their culture, and performing traditional ceremonies on a pastoral lease area. Police officers approached the group and asked them to leave, stating that an international mining company occupying the land had claimed they were trespassing. The site was the subject of an X Agreement (students need to research and find the name of this agreement), but the family opposed the agreement and the mine, saying that Aboriginal people had been exercising their culture by fishing and hunting and performing ceremonies for 40,000 years. Cultural rights of Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples are specifically protected by the X Act, including the right to maintain their distinctive spiritual, material, and economic relationship with the land and waters with which they hold a connection. The family told the police that they had received expert advice that they could lawfully exercise their cultural rights and responsibilities. However, the police required the group to pack up their equipment and leave within an hour. The family says that this caused grief and trauma.Due Week 8 sponse to He case s citations but not the es to be in a rent format and 1560 words in length (including in-text citations but not the end text reference list The report should: include at least / scholarly peer reviewed inural articles as well as some of the relevant weekly textbook references. adhere to the course formatting guidelines . these are listed in the assessment section on your unit site. use APA 7th referencing. The case study written response will be written in a report formal academic style with the following: . Cover page. . Contents page. . A selected model or framework of oppressive practice. . Part One: Aspects of diversity and barriers to inclusion. . Part Two: Historical context and structural oppression . Part Three: Power and privilege. . Part Four: Project plan The conclusion will summarise your key points and recommendations