Question: Case Study 2: Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977) and answer the following questions: a. What purpose did the height and weight requirements serve?
Case Study 2: Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977) and answer the following questions:
a. What purpose did the height and weight requirements serve? Do you think they were made to intentionally discriminate against women?
b. How could management have avoided this outcome?
c. Does your view of illegal discrimination change now that you have seen how disparate impact claims work? Would you have been able to foresee this outcome? Explain.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
