Case Study $2$ Ques$$ons:

$1.$ Was the document given to the sponsor a risk management plan?

$2.$ Did the project manager actually perform effective risk management?

$3.$ Was the appropriate amount of time and money spent identifying the risk events?

$4.$ Should one step be allowed to "dominate" the entire risk management process?

$5.$ Are there any significant benefits to the amount of work already done for risk identification?

$6.$ Should the $100$ or so risk events identified have been categorized? If so$,$ how?

$7.$ Can probabilities of occurrence and expected outcomes $($i$.$e$.$ damage$)$ be accurately assigned

to $100$ risk events?

$8.$ Should a project management methodology provide guidance for the development of a risk

management plan?

$9.$ Given the life$-$cycle phases in the case study, in which phase would it be appropriate to

identify the risk management plan?

$10.$ What are your feelings on the project manager's comme