Case study $8\mathrm{.}1$

project$\mathrm{.}81$askingmeasure that impact?positve or negative$-$on collaborative research? How could yapplications. How do you envision these policieshaving an impactdecision on whether or not to accept the invitation?with someone you have never met. How will you proceed to reach a$3.$ Suppose you have been invited to collaborate on a research projectin the byline of collaborative papers? Why or why not?$2.$ Should scientific publishers limit the number of authors that appearcollaborative relationship between two faculty scientists? How?this chapter? If not, why? If so$,$ is it fundamentally different from theconsider it to be a scientific collaboration as the term is discussed in$1.$ Consider the faculty mentor$-$predoctoral trainee relationship. Do you$8\mathrm{.}2$were given. At the third meeting, Dr$.$ Kelly opened the discussion andhesitant about speaking up as more discussion ensued and assignmentsan untenured assistant professor, pulled back from the table and becameto assigning duties, but Dr$.$ Kelly appeared not to have noticed. LDr$.$ Crispin,ing. Dr$.$ Lee tentatively tried to intervene and suggest a different approachdelegating duties to the rest of the group for completion by the next meet$-$progressed, Dr$.$ Kelly, a colleague and Dr$.$ Lee's department chair, startedresearchers and would have tremendous scientific impact. As the meetinga solution to the major structural hurdle, which had been elusive to otherlaunched into talkingabout theproject and designing experiments to finddata to demonstrate proof of concept. The following week the groupof the project as well as to discuss how they were going to get some initialproject.The new project team agreed to meet weekly to firm up the goalsconsiderably and several of the invitees commited to collaborating on theseemed to be building. Inthe end, the concept for the projectQuestionsof professional development needed for promotion.todemonstrate independence$-$ain some cases, law:. Beginning investigators shouldl consider collaborativeusing careful negotiation, relevant policydocuments,and andguidelinenational partners$-$present challenges must be carefullyaddressed thatkinds of collaborations$--$in particular those withthe need for interdisciplinary research tonized. Modern$-$day collaboration has become commonplace,address questions inall fields,ing toadvice do you have for Chris about the next steps in this process?so that this encounter would have had a morepositive outcome? WhatSands to be so short with him. What could Chris or Dr$.$ Sandshave doneleft at the table wondering if he said or did something that caused Dr$.$says yes, but that she is pretty busy and cannot promise anything. Chris isget to another mneeting. When Chris asks if he can contact her again, sheAfter about $20$ minutes, Dr$.$ Sands looks at her watch and says she needs tocerned that she seems distracted and is not really paying attention to him.Chris triesexplaining his project to Dr$.$Sands butstarts tobecome con$-$she has coffee with Chris, insisting that she pay for them both. Over coffee,bound. Although anxious and distracted by her own reaction of surprise,be challenges associated with mentoring someone who is wheelchairgives way to thoughts of being uncomfortable about what she thinksreer, but none with physical disabilities. Her surprisehterto meet with him to talk about his researchChrisexplainswillingher if she wouldtoral student in another department,messagefromDr. Shirika Sands receives an e$-$mailChris, adoc$-$and some federal agencies allow co$-$principal investigators On ga$+.$ Some journals allow shared first authorship on scientific publicationshad shifteddiscussion, ideas were thrown around, and a fair amount of enthusiasmto her office to discuss it informally. During the meeting there was lots ofsome more input and thoughts about her idea, she inviteda few colleaguesidea she thought would be a great new translational project. To getDr. Aijuan Lee, a tenured associateprofessor ofphysiology, had ancriticalelement in building aportfolioofficials. The perceived need to collaborate should not outweigh the noodopportunities, seeking advice trom mentors, Supervisors, and institutionindustryorwithinter$-$and must be able to accommodate conflict anddisagreement.Certainpoints of the relationship. The collaborativeis relationship basedontrusting to the commitment to collaborate aspects and spans allandtemporalamong the research team. This begins with discussionslead$-$ the earliestThe recipe for successful collaboration is dominatedbycommunicationthe authors' bylines of papers and even in theeawardingofNobelPrizes.especially the biomedical and lifecollaboration sciences. Consequently,has become a critical component of fscientific discovery.ThisisevidentindrivenbyThe value of collaboration in scientific research beenlongrecog$-$ hasuponseeing Chrisrunning through her head. She hasmentored many studentsover her ca$-$Chris in a wheelchair. She is not prepared for this, and many thoughts starthim the next day for coffee. When Dr$.$ San