Question: Case Study A contractor operates a rock crusher and stores the material until needed in an adjacent stockpile area. The stockpile area is unpaved, and

Case Study
A contractor operates a rock crusher and stores the material until needed in an adjacent stockpile area. The stockpile area is unpaved, and some of the stockpiled aggregate is contaminated by the sub-grade and cannot be used. The estimated stockpile losses are shown in the Table 1. This equates to a combined loss of 8% each year.
The contractor is considering to pave the stockpile area to reduce the loss of aggregate. Paving the stockpile area would reduce the losses due to contamination to about 2%. The crusher produces 250,000 tons/year at a cost of $1.50/ton. The new paving should last 10 years, and there has no salvage value.
The paving will cover 4.56 acres. The previous stockpile losses will serve as sub-grade and base courses for the new surfacing. A 3 thick surface will require 3700 tons of asphaltic concrete, which costs $20/ton installed. The engineering and site work involve a one-time cost of about $5000. The surface requires routine maintenance costing about $1000/year.
Table 2 shows the uncertainty (lower and upper limits) of the data estimated by the contractor to evaluate the feasibility of paving the stockpile area. Assuming the contractor has a minimum accepted rate of return (MARR) of 12%, answer the following questions (the use of Microsoft Excel to solve this case study is strongly recommended. Excel charts and functions (e.g.RATEandPV) can speed up your calculations, make your solution more accurate, and facilitate neater submission):
1. Determine the internal rate of return (IRR) of the stockpile area paving.
2. For each of the 7 variables in Table 2, use IRR to graph NPV vs. the value of this variable, as the variable ranges between the limits you derive from the table (use 10% intervals).(hint: for each graph, use estimated values of the other factors, e.g., use values ranging between 5 to 20 years for the economic life on x-axis versus the NPV on the y-axis assuming average values for the other variables).
3. Based on your answer to question 2, which of the factors in Table 2 is riskier for the decision about whether to pave the stockpile area? (hint: examine the variance of NPV between upper and lower limits)
4. Estimate the IRR for the worst-case and best-case scenarios for all 7 variables in Table 2.(hint: for the best-case scenario assume all variables will have their best possible outcome and vice versa for the worst-case scenario).
5. What is the NPV of the worst-case and best-case scenarios using the contractors MARR?
6. Apply some other analyses, of your choice other than the ones listed above, you deem could help the contractor make their decision about paving the stockpile area.
7. Based on your answers to questions 1 through 6, what is your recommendation for paving the stockpile area? Explain your reasoning.
Table 1 Current Stockpile Losses Table 2 Lower and Upper Limits on Estimated Data
Case Study A contractor operates a rock crusher

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Civil Engineering Questions!