Case Study: Maria This case study is based on Maria Vanderputten v. Sexdaco Packaging Corp. and Gerry Sanvida (No. 2, 3 and 4). In presenting the case to the Tribunal, the applicant's lawyers raised these issues: She was harassed in the workplace and subjected to a poisoned work environment She was dismissed from her job because of her gender identity. When Maria began working for the packaging company in 2003, her first name was Tony. She was hired as a general laborer on August 24, 2003. In 2008, she was accepted in the gender identity clinic and began transition from living as a man to living as a woman. She started the process of sex reassignment and developed female breasts as a result of hormone treatments. Maria says that she was harassed, subjected to a poisoned work environment and dismissed - all violations of the Human Rights Code. Maria said that Gerry, a lead hand and machine operator, played a central role in the harassment and the incident that led to her dismissal. The packing company said the allegations never happened. The company argued that it treated the applicant appropriately, considering her a man and treating her like other men until it received medical or legal documentation that she was a woman. They say they fired her because of her attitude and being involved in workplace conflicts that were her fault, as well as insubordination. Discussion Questions: A sum of $4000 is due for payment three years from now. You want to know he much this payment will be worth seven years from now if money is worth 9% p compounded annually, determine the equivalent value. Find i (periodic rate) a 0.0045 % Ob 0.0 % Oc9% Od 0.45% e 4.5% A sum of 54000 is due for payment three years from now. You want to know how much this payment will be worth seven years from now if money is worth 9% p.a. DULL F1 F2 F3 F4 1 F5 Il F6 N F7 F8 @ 2 # 1 N 3 $ 4 * % 7 de &