Case study ROQUET v$.$ ARTHUR ANDERSEN answer the question at the end of this case:

$1.$ What was the legal issue in this case? What did the

court decide?

$2.$ From the evidence presented, when were the busi$-$

ness circumstances causing the mass layoff $$reason$-$

ably foreseeable?$$

$3.$ Does the court adequately consider whether earlier,

but not necessarily sixty days, notice was required?

$4.$ Why might a firm be reluctant to provide informa$-$

tion to employees about an impending layoff or clo$-$

sure? Does the WARN Act strike the right balance

between employer and employee interests in these

circumstances? Explain.