CASE STUDY: The term ordinary share is usually applied to a share where the holder has no
Question:
CASE STUDY:
The term ordinary share is usually applied to a share where the
holder has no priority in being a dividend or receiving a capital contribution
in the event of the firm going into liquidation. It is also widely accepted
that a share is more difficult to value in practice than a bond, for at least
three reasons. Firstly, the promised cash flows (Dividends) are not known in
advance with ordinary shares. Secondly, the life of the investment is
essentially forever. There is no maturity for an ordinary share. Thirdly, there
is no easy way to observe the rate of return that the market requires.
Nonetheless, as we will see, there are cases in which we can estimate the value
of the future cash flows for a share and thus determine its value by using
dividend based approaches (Ross et al, 2019).
An obvious problem with dividend based approach to share
valuation is that many companies do not pay dividends. A common approach is to
make use of the price-to-earnings ratio.
The price-to-earnings ratio or P/E is one of the most
widely-used stock analysis tools used by investors and analysts for determining
share valuation. In addition to showing whether a company's stock price is
overvalued or undervalued, the P/E can reveal how a stock's valuation compares
to its industry group or a benchmark like the S&P 500 Index.
Empirical research find that that firms with low price to
earnings ratios (value firms) earn higher stock returns in the long term than
high price to earnings firms (growth firms) (Houmes & Chira, 2015). They
also suggest that for high P/E firms, boards of directors and outside
shareholders are less likely to intervene since higher returns reflect
increased agency incentives (agency theory based) for value-creating managers.
The term ordinary share is
usually applied to a share where the holder has no priority in being a dividend
or receiving a capital contribution in the event of the firm going into
liquidation. It is also widely accepted that a share is more difficult to value
in practice than a bond, for at least three reasons. Firstly, the promised cash
flows (Dividends) are not known in advance with ordinary shares. Secondly, the
life of the investment is essentially forever. There is no maturity for an
ordinary share. Thirdly, there is no easy way to observe the rate of return
that the market requires. Nonetheless, as we will see, there are cases
in which we can estimate the value of the future cash flows for a share and
thus determine its value by using dividend based approaches (Ross et al, 2019).
An obvious problem with dividend based approach to share
valuation is that many companies do not pay dividends. A common approach is to
make use of the price-to-earnings ratio.
The price-to-earnings ratio or P/E is one of the most
widely-used stock analysis tools used by investors and analysts for determining
share valuation. In addition to showing whether a company's stock price is
overvalued or undervalued, the P/E can reveal how a stock's valuation compares
to its industry group or a benchmark like the S&P 500 Index.
Empirical research find that that firms with low price to
earnings ratios (value firms) earn higher stock returns in the long term than
high price to earnings firms (growth firms) (Houmes & Chira, 2015). They
also suggest that for high P/E firms, boards of directors and outside
shareholders are less likely to intervene since higher returns reflect
increased agency incentives (agency theory based) for value-creating managers.
QUESTION:
Identify and evaluate difficulties and limitations in using the PE ratio to value share.