Challenges of explaining project dynamics Systems analysts may need help explaining the project triangle to management because the scope, timing, and pricing are interconnected and complicated. All three triangle legs are crucial to the project's success, and changing one will affect the other two (Harsch & Festing, 2020). A project's scope can be trimmed if one leg has a fixed budget and the other is a falling-behind plan. As a system analyst, one must communicate strategically and understand technology to convince management of this trade-off. Management norms vary, making this explanation difficult to understand. They may have established severe financial restrictions and expected the project to be completed on time without comprehending what would happen if the scope was reduced. Systems analysts must balance these demands while stating that something must give. When plans are behind and funds can't be modified, it is critical to reduce scope to stay practical (Harsch & Festing, 2020). While keeping the project on track and within budget is smart, this could damage trust. Upper-level managers who need help understanding technology may misjudge project results. The systems analyst may need to simplify technical concerns to explain cutting scope to the company's aims. Management's reluctance to