Chapter $15\mathrm{.}2$ in the Business Ethics Workshop discusses five approaches to environmental protection:

The environment shouldn't be protected.

The environment should be protected in the name of serving human welfare.

The environment should be protected in the name of serving future generations ${?}^7$ welfare.

The environment should be protected in$]$the name of serving animal welfare.

The environment should be protected for its own sake.

Select one of these arguments and apply it to the situation with Lake Mary Jane. Use examples from the article to support your argument.