Chat GPT wrote the following multiple$-$choice question about the doctrine of strict liability.

Buster owns a marine park that features trained sea animals, including seals. Lucille visits the park and is injured when a trained seal unexpectedly bites her when she is feeding it$.$ Which of the following is true?

$($a$)$ Buster is not liable for Lucille's injuries because she assumed the risk of being bitten by a trained seal when she visited the marine park.

$($b$)$ Lucille must prove that Buster was negligent in order to recover damages for her injuries.

$($c$)$ Buster may be liable for Lucille's injuries under the legal doctrine of strict liability because he engaged in an abnormally dangerous activity.

$($d$)$ Lucille must prove that Buster intended to harm her in order to recover damages for her injuries.

ChatGPT explained the correct answer as follows:

The correct answer is c$.$ Buster may be liable for Lucille's injuries under the legal doctrine of strict liability because he engaged in an abnormally dangerous activity. The legal doctrine of strict liability imposes liability on an individual or business engaged in an abnormally dangerous activity, regardless of whether the individual or business was negligent. In this case, owning and operating a marine park with trained sea animals is considered an abnormally dangerous activity, and therefore Buster may be held strictly liable for Lucille's injuries caused by the trained seal biting her. Option a is incorrect because the assumption of risk defense does not apply in cases involving strict liability. Option b is incorrect because negligence is not a factor in cases involving strict liability. Option d is incorrect because intent to harm is not required under the doctrine of strict liability.

The "correct" answer generated by Chat GPT is not entirely correct. Explain why.