check for plagarism: $1\mathrm{.}1$

Reputational damage: If a bank is found to be non$-$compliant with the FIC Act, it could damage its reputation and lead to a loss of customers and business.

Financial penalties: The FIC can impose significant financial penalties on banks that are non$-$compliant with the Act. These penalties can be in the millions of dollars.

Criminal prosecution: In some cases, bank employees or executives could be criminally prosecuted for non$-$compliance with the FIC Act.

Loss of operating license: In the most serious cases, a bank could lose its operating license if it is found to be in repeated or wilful violation of the FIC Act.

Regulatory Sanctions: Non$-$compliant banks may face sanctions such as restrictions on their operations, which can affect their business performance.

Increased Scrutiny: Banks found to be non$-$compliant may be subjected to more frequent inspections and audits by the regulator, impacting their operations and resources.

These are just a few of the risks that banks face for non$-$compliance with the FIC Act. It is important for banks to take steps to comply with the Act in order to avoid these risks.

$1\mathrm{.}2$

The Bank imposed administrative fines on Capitec and Deutsche Bank because they failed to comply with certain regulations and laws. For example, Capitec was fined for breaching the Bank's rules on capital adequacy and liquidity management. This means that Capitec did not have enough capital or liquidity to meet its obligations to customers. Deutsche Bank was fined for breaching the Bank's rules on risk management and governance. This means that Deutsche Bank did not have adequate risk management processes in place, and its governance structures were not effective. The Bank imposed administrative fines on Capitec and Deutsche Bank because they failed to comply with certain regulations and laws. Final answer: The Bank imposed administrative fines on Capitec and Deutsche Bank because they failed to comply with certain regulations and laws. For example, Capitec was fined for breaching the Bank's rules on capital adequacy and liquidity management. This means that Capitec did not have enough capital or liquidity to meet its obligations to customers. Deutsche Bank was fined for breaching the Bank's rules on risk management and governance. This means that Deutsche Bank did not have adequate risk management processes in place, and its governance structures were not effective.

$1\mathrm{.}3$

Compliance with "Know Your Customer" $($KYC$)$ Legislative Requirements under FICA

To comply with the "Know Your Customer" $($KYC$)$ legislative requirements under the Financial Intelligence Centre Act $($FICA$),$ Deutsche Bank must adhere to the following key measures:

$$ Customer Identification: Implement robust procedures to verify the identity of customers, including individuals, legal entities, and beneficial owners.

$$ Risk Assessment: Conduct thorough risk assessments to understand the nature and extent of potential money laundering and terrorist financing risks associated with each customer.

$$ Ongoing Monitoring: Establish processes for ongoing monitoring of customer transactions, behaviour, and risk profile to detect and report any suspicious activities.

$$ Record Keeping: Maintain comprehensive records of customer identification, transactions, and risk assessments for a specified period as mandated by FICA.

$$ Compliance Culture: Foster a compliance culture within the organization, ensuring that all staff members are aware of their responsibilities and receive regular training on KYC requirements.

By adhering to these measures, Deutsche Bank can ensure compliance with the KYC legislative requirements under FICA and contribute to the prevention of financial crime.

$1\mathrm{.}4$

In the context of this report, the regulator refers to the government agency responsible for overseeing and enforcing compliance with specific regulations or laws. The nature of the compliance monitoring role of the regulator typically involves the following:

$1.$ Monitoring: The regulator monitors compliance with the relevant regulations or laws by conducting regular inspections, audits, and reviews of businesses or organizations. This may involve onsite visits, offsite data analysis, or other monitoring activities to ensure compliance.

$2.$ Inspections: The regulator conducts inspections of businesses or organizations to assess their compliance with regulations or laws. These inspections may be announced or unannounced, and they typically involve reviewing documents, interviewing employees, and examining practices and procedures.

$3.$ Audits: The regulator may conduct audits of businesses or organizations to verify their compliance with regulations or laws. Audits involve a comprehensive review of financial records, systems, and processes to ensure compliance with relevant requirements.

$4.$ Compliance assessments: The regulator may conduct compliance assessments, which are evaluations of a business's or organization's compliance