Check My Work $(1$ remaining$)$

Slimline and Distributor signed a contract providing that Distributor would use reasonable efforts to promote and sell Slimline's diet drink. Slimline was already being sold in Warehouse Club. After the contract was signed, Distributor stopped conducting in$-$store demos of Slimline. It did not repackage the product as Slimline and Warehouse had requested. Sales of Slimline continued to increase during the term of the contract. Slimline sued Distributor, alleging a violation of the agreement. Who should win?

"Reasonable" in the contract means

Distributor's best defense is

Did Distributor act in good faith? $.$

Distributor $$ successfully defend itself based on the fact that the Slimline sales increased.

In order to make it easier to defend itcelf againct thic thene nf rlaim nictrih itnr rould have written in the contract C $].$