[ Choose ] atte e three attempts to score you Discharged Contract st score will be recorded. My Judicial Admissions Stu 's 8 & 9 completed and ready Capacity Legality of Purpose ourself the opportunity to do t Material Breach es, Excuse for Non-Performance Consideration iX Rescission as a Remedy Executed Contract Implied-in-Fact Contract Class-Action Lawsuit Question 1 Unilateral Contract Express Terms Plaintiff Matching: Answers may or Release ch corr Performance response is worth 2 points. Waiver Bilateral Contract Defendant Michael Randall and Molly [ Choose ] Moskowitz (also known as the couple) The couple's $5,000 deposit [ Choose ] The lawsuit was filed and included "more than 1,000 [ Choose ] other Cescaphe clients potentially affected by the Search the web aPartial 8 / 20 pts Term Question 1 Matching: Answers may only be used one time, and each correct response is worth 2 points. Michael Randall and Plaintiff Molly Moskowitz (also known as the couple) The couple's $5,000 Consideration deposit The lawsuit was filed Excuse for Non-F and included "more than 1,000 other Cescaphe clients nline potentially affected by the company's actions". al "The agreement Release between the couple and Cescaphe clearlyTerm uJ Inline real (as "The agreement between the couple and Cescaphe clearly states the $5,000 deposit would 'guarantee' the date they wanted. Of course that agreement also clearly states the the $5,000 deposit was non-refundable." Force Majeu re language was included in the contract. The couple paid a $5,000 deposit to secure June 12, 2020 as the date of their outdoor wedding with Cescaphe at Water Works. Cescaphe accepted this deposit Release Release Express Terms V 'll ne The couple paid a $5,000 deposit to secure June 12, 2020 as the date of their outdoor wedding with Cescaphe at Water Works. Cescaphe accepted this deposit and agreed to host this event at Water Works on June 12, 2020. Through their attorney, the couple asked for the return of their $5,000. If we assume that Molly Moskowitz and Michael Randall had the ability to be bound by a contract, they would have met Express Terms Rescission as a R: Material Breach V V V If we assume that Material Breach Molly Moskowitz and Michael Randall had the ability to be bound by a contract, they would have met the legal requirement of Cescaphe, the Defendant wedding and special- events company The terms of the Judicial Admissio contract were not fulfilled due to the pandemic and the government- mandated shutdown of business - making this a issue.Cescaphe, the Defendant wedding and special- events company The terms of the Judicial Admissio contract were not fulfilled due to the pandemic and the government- mandated shutdown of business - making this a issue. Question 2 Not yet graded / 5 pts Using details from the article, identify and explain the legal reason why this contract had to be in writing. Specifically identify the law and why it applies to this situation. Your