Choose the correct case with regard to the collateral source rule. The court held that the continued payment of a salary has to be disregarded in assessing a plaintiff's damages for this disability. 1. Van Heerden v African Guarantee Insurance Co 1951 (3) SA 730 (C) 2. Henning v South British Insurance 1963 (1) SA 272 (O) 3. Major v Yorkshire Insurance 1949 (1) PH J1 (D) 4. Santam v Byleveldt 1973 (2) SA 146 (A) Choose the correct case with regard to the collateral source rule. On the strength of the evidence of the plaintiff that he received the amount in question as a salary and not as a gift, the court held that it was a compensating advantage reducing his damages. 1. Van Heerden v African Guarantee Insurance Co 1951 (3) SA 730 (C) 2. Henning v South British Insurance 1963 (1) SA 272 (O) 3. Major v Yorkshire Insurance 1949 (1) PH J1 (D) 4. Santam v Byleveldt 1973 (2) SA 146 (A) Choose the correct case with regard to the collateral source rule. The court confirmed that, where an employer out of generosity continues to pay his employee's salary, this fact will not reduce his claim for damages. 1. Van Heerden v African Guarantee Insurance Co 1951 (3) SA 730 (C) 2. Henning v South British Insurance 1963 (1) SA 272 (O) 3. Major v Yorkshire Insurance 1949 (1) PH J1 (D) 4. Santam v Byleveldt 1973 (2) SA 146 (A)