Cite the following answer Below is a complete answer addressing both parts of the question. 2.1 Differentiate between the Two Safety Risk Assessments (6 marks)In many safety management systems, two main approaches to risk assessment are used: a qualitative risk assessment and a quantitative risk assessment. Their differences are as follows:Purpose and ApproachQualitative Risk Assessment: Uses descriptive methods to identify hazards and rank risks based on subjective judgment. Relies on expert opinions, past experiences, and categorization of risk (e.g., low, medium, high). It is less time-consuming and is useful during the early stages of planning or when numerical data are scarce.Quantitative Risk Assessment: Uses numerical data and statistical methods to estimate both the likelihood (probability) and potential impact (consequence) of hazards. Involves calculation techniques (e.g., fault tree analysis, Monte Carlo simulation) to arrive at a numerical value for risk. It is more resource-intensive and requires sufficient data, but provides more precise information for decision-making.Level of Detail and Resource RequirementA qualitative assessment is generally simpler and can be performed with minimal resources. It offers a broad overview of safety risks and assists in prioritizing areas for further investigation.A quantitative assessment, by contrast, is detailed and data-driven, providing a more robust basis for implementing and justifying specific control measures. This method requires more time, expertise, and often the support of specialized software.Application in the Project LifecycleQualitative Assessment: Often used as an initial screening tool to quickly identify potential hazards in a multi-story building project. Helps management decide whether further, more detailed analysis is needed.Quantitative Assessment: Applied later in the planning process when refined data are available. Supports costbenefit analysis and the selection of specific engineering or administrative safety controls.2.2 Role of the Safety Practitioner in Safety Design (3 marks)The safety practitioner plays a critical role during the design phase of a project by ensuring that safety is effectively built into the project from the outset. Their responsibilities include:Hazard Identification and MitigationReviewing design plans to identify potential hazards and unsafe conditions before construction begins.Recommending design modifications or engineering controls that will minimize the risk of accidents or injuries.Integration and CoordinationWorking closely with architects, engineers, and construction managers to incorporate safety features (such as proper egress, fire suppression systems, and fall protection measures) into the buildings design.Coordinating with regulatory bodies and ensuring that the design complies with applicable safety codes and standards.Documentation and CommunicationDeveloping and maintaining documentation of risk assessments and safety designs, which is essential for both regulatory compliance and future safety audits.Communicating the identified risks and recommended safety measures to all stakeholders to ensure a shared understanding of the importance of embedded safety strategies. SummaryThe qualitative risk assessment is a simpler, subjective method used primarily for initial hazard screening, while the quantitative risk assessment provides a numerical, detailed estimation of risks for more informed decision-making. The safety practitioners role in safety design is to integrate hazard identification, ensure appropriate risk mitigation through design modifications, and coordinate with all parties to guarantee compliance and a safe working environment throughout the project lifecycle.