Citron offers a new civil cause of action expressly for online harassment as a viable solution to the problem of internet harassment. She claims that under a new civil cause of action, victims would have more protection, and corporations would have the incentive to engage in more responsible content control methods. Further, she contends that a new civil cause of action would acknowledge the particular harms faced by victims of online harassment, such as psychological and emotional injury, and would provide victims more access to remedies. This would be done by acknowledging the distinct damages incurred by online harassment victims, such as psychological and emotional impairment.

How does Citron's solution relate to the 1983 Kuhlmeier case AND the Parkland shooting? How would the solution help or harm these cases? Discuss in detail.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Danielle Citron is a legal scholar who has advocated for legal measures to address online harassment To analyze how Citrons proposed solution relates ... View the full answer