Complete the MRP record for a bicycle frame using a L4L lot-sizing strategy Repeat using a fed order quantity of 100 frames. Compare and contrast the results. What are the benefits and drawbacks to each approach? Part Name: Bicycle frame Week 4 MRP Record Lead time 2 weeks onhando Salety stock Order quantity: LAL Gross requirements Scheduled receipts Available inventory Net requirements Panned order receipts Planned order releases Week 1 70 70 Week 2 50 50 Week 3 80 0 Week 5 70 Week 6 Week 7 Weeks 80 80 80 0 0 Part Name: Bicycle frame MRP Record Lead time 2 weeks Onhando Order quantity FOO100 Week Week 2 50 100 Week 3 30 Week 80 Weeks 70 0 Week 30 70 100 30 80 0 g Scheduled Available to re Paned order Complete the MRP record for a bicycle frame using a L4L lot-sizing strategy. Repeat using a fixed order quantity of 100 frames. Compare and Part Name: Bicycle frame MRP Record Lead time = 2 weeks On-hand=0 Safety stock = 0 Order quantity: LAL Gross requirements Scheduled receipts Available inventory Net requirements Planned order receipts Planned order releases Week 1 70 70 Week 2 50 50 Week 3 80 0 Week 4 80 0 Week 5 70 0 Week 6 60 0 Week 7 80 Week 8 80 0 Part Name: Bicycle frame Week 6 MRP Record Lead time = 2 weeks On-hand = 0 Safety stock = 0 Order quantity FOQ-100 Gross requirements Scheduled receipts Available inventory Net requirements Planned order receipts Planned order releases Week 7 80 Week 8 80 Week 1 70 100 Week 3 80 0 Week 4 80 0 Week 5 70 0 Week 2 50 100 30 0 0 0