compose a 4+ p@G3 E$$AY that develops a specific argument that responds to the prompt:Which lies at the heart of conflict between groups of people: beliefs, wealth, or power? Be sure to address all three topics throughout your essay in order to determine which of these concepts is at the heart of the conflict. My topic is hitler/germanys contributions and involvement in World War 2. I do think that beliefs and power are the heart of the conflict. make sure to use evidence from articles to support it. use quotes as well.

Criteria Thesis Statement Research and Evidence Argument Development Organization Clarity and Coherence Mechanics and Style Exemplary (4) Thesis is exceptionally clear, specific, and arguable, effectively guiding the entire paper and providing a nuanced stance on the topic. Demonstrates comprehensive research from a diverse range of credible sources, expertly integrated to support arguments with rich detail and analysis. Develops a sophisticated and nuanced argument with exceptional depth, providing insightful analysis and addressing potential counterarguments with clarity and complexity. Demonstrates impeccable organization with a clear introduction, logical progression of ideas in body paragraphs, and a compelling conclusion that effectively synthesizes key points. Transitions between paragraphs are seamless. Writing is exceptionally clear, coherent, and precise, effectively communicating ideas with impeccable clarity and coherence. Sentences are well-constructed, and vocabulary is varied and sophisticated. Demonstrates impeccable command of grammar, punctuation, and spelling, with flawless execution throughout the paper. Writing style is engaging and maintains a formal Proficient (3) The thesis is clear, specific, and arguable, effectively guiding the paper and presenting a focused stance on the topic. Incorporates thorough research from credible sources, effectively integrated to support arguments with relevant detail and analysis. Develops a strong argument with substantial depth, offering insightful analysis and addressing potential counterarguments effectively. Displays strong organization with a clear introduction, coherent body paragraphs, and a solid conclusion that effectively summarizes key points. Transitions between paragraphs are mostly smooth. Writing is clear, coherent, and precise, effectively communicating ideas with clarity and coherence. Sentences are mostly well-constructed, and vocabulary is appropriate for the audience. Exhibits a strong command of grammar, punctuation, and spelling, with minor errors that do not detract significantly from clarity. Writing style is engaging Basic (2) The thesis is somewhat clear and arguable, but may lack specificity or focus, providing a basic stance on the topic. Utilizes adequate research from credible sources, though integration may lack depth or relevance to fully support arguments. Develops a basic argument with some depth, providing analysis and addressing potential counterarguments, though may lack complexity or thoroughness. Shows basic organization with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, but transitions may be somewhat awkward or lack clarity. Writing is generally clear and coherent, though may contain occasional awkward sentences or lack precision in communicating ideas. Vocabulary is mostly appropriate for the audience. Shows an adequate command of grammar, punctuation, and spelling, with occasional errors that may detract from clarity. Writing style may be inconsistent or lack engagement. Developing (1) The thesis lacks clarity, specificity, or arguability, offering a vague or unclear stance on the topic. Shows limited research from credible sources, with minimal integration and insufficient detail or analysis to support arguments effectively. Presents a rudimentary argument with limited depth, providing basic analysis and addressing few potential counterarguments. Organization is inconsistent or unclear, with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion that may lack coherence or logical progression. Transitions between paragraphs are confusing or absent. Writing is somewhat unclear or incoherent, with awkward sentences or lack of precision in communicating ideas. Vocabulary may be repetitive or inappropriate for the audience at times. Mechanics and style are inconsistent, with frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling that detract from clarity. Writing style may be inappropriate or informal. Inadequate (0) The thesis is missing or does not provide any clear direction for the paper, failing to establish a stance on the topic. Research is insufficient or nonexistent, lacking credible sources and failing to provide any meaningful support for arguments. Argument is underdeveloped or unclear, lacking depth, analysis, and consideration of potential counterarguments. Organization is lacking or absent, with ideas presented in a disjointed orillogical manner, making it difficult to follow the flow of the paper. Writing is unclear, incoherent, or disjointed, making it difficult to understand ideas. Sentences are often awkward or poorly constructed, and vocabulary is inappropriate or limited. Mechanics and style are ineffective or inappropriate for academic writing, with frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling that significantly impede clarity