Question: computer. 3 3) There is no contract because the last offer had lapsed. 4) There is a contract because at some point in time Mary

 computer. 3 3) There is no contract because the last offer
had lapsed. 4) There is a contract because at some point in

computer. 3 3) There is no contract because the last offer had lapsed. 4) There is a contract because at some point in time Mary was willing to sell and Mr. Jones was willing to buy the computer system for $1 500. There is a contract, because once a seller makes an offer she cannot change her mind; she is bound to receive an acceptance. 5) 9 Question 34 (1 point) Which of the following is true with respect to the operation of the postbox rule? 12 1) For the postbox rule to apply, the offer must be made by mail. 15 2) If the postbox rule applies, an acceptance must be communicated and heard by the offeree before it is effective. 7 18 3) If the postbox rule applies, the acceptance is effective at the point of mailing. 20 21 4) If the postbox rule applies, the only way for an acceptance to be effective is to send it by mail. 5) For the postbox rule to apply, the offeror must make that clear when the offer is made. 23 24 Question 35 (1 point) Which of the following shows the use of the doctrine of promissory (equitable) ESL Length: 2:00:00 Lovepreet Kaur: Attempt 1 Page 1: 5) Require skills and abilities expected of a professional in that veld. 1 2 Sw 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 Question 29 (1 point) Stella bought a cup of coffee at the drive-through window at a coffee-shop.tolding the cup between her knees and attempting to take off the lid to add cream, she spilled the coffee. She suffered burns to her thighs. If this happened in Canada, which of the following is false? 1) If the coffee-shop proves that its manager heated the coffee as a reasonable manager would, the plaintiff's case would be dismissed even though she suffered burns. 2) To succeed with the defense that she volunteered to take the risk, the coffee- shop would have to prove that she took the risk of physical injury and the legal risk as well If Stella sues the coffee-shop, the company's best argument is that it didn't owe her a duty of care If the court finds the plaintiff contributorily negligent causing 60% of her loss, she must suffer that portion of the loss and will not be compensated for it by the defendant If Stella sues the coffee-shop for negligence, she will have to prove that the company owed her a duty of care, was below the standard of care owed, and caused her foreseeable damage. 13 14 15 16 17 18 3) 19 20 21 5) 22 23 24 Question 30 (1 point) Which of the following is not an ingredient necessary to form a contract

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Accounting Questions!