Consequentialism vs$.$ Deontology in Business Ethics

How would a consequentialist and a deontologist approach an ethical dilemma in the workplace where a decision benefits the

majority but harms a minority? Discuss the potential conflicts between adhering to moral duties $($Deontology$)$ and achieving

optimal outcomes $($Consequentialism$).$

Example Scenario: A company decides to lay off $10\%$ of its workforce to prevent bankruptcy and save the jobs of $90\%.$ How

would the two ethical frameworks justify this decision?