Question: Consider rdt 3 . 0 protocol. The sender side of rdt 3 . 0 simply ignores ( that is , takes no action on )
Consider rdt protocol. The sender side of rdt simply ignores that is takes no action on all
received packets that are either in error or have the wrong value in the acknum field of an
acknowledgment packet. Suppose that in such circumstances, rdt were simply to retransmit the
current data packet. Would the protocol still work? Hint: Consider what would happen if there were
only bit errors; there are no packet losses but premature timeouts can occur. Consider how many times
the nth packet is sent, in the limit as approaches infinity.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
