Consider$\_$Sv Goliath$\_19723$ SA $1($A$),$ in which A$,$ who was under compulsion from B and was fearing for his life, assisted $B$ to kill C$.$ Would it have made a difference to the outcome of the case if A had had an opportunity to escape from B before assisting B with the killing, but A failed to make use of that opportunity? Select only the best option:

a$.$ Yes, the ground of justification that A had relied on would have failed, but another ground of justification would have been available.

b$.$ The outcome would have been broadly similar with some variation in respect of the details.

c$.$ No$,$ the outcome would have been the exactly the same.

d$.$ Yes, the ground of justification that A had relied on would have failed because of non$-$compliance with the requirements of that defence.