Question: Consider the fallowing two hypothetical case-control studies (Fake data), each studying the relationship between eating bacon and stomach cancer stratified by nationality. Complete questions after


Consider the fallowing two hypothetical case-control studies (Fake data), each studying the relationship between eating bacon and stomach cancer stratified by nationality. Complete questions after presentation of studies STUDY 1 JAPANESE AMERICAN Stomach No Stomach No Cancer Cancer Cancer Cancer Eats Eats 200 100 300 115 265 380 Bacon Bacon No No 100 200 300 20 200 220 Bacon Bacon 135 465 600 300 300 600 STUDY 2 JAPANESE AMERICAN No Stomach Stomach No Cancer Cancer Cancer Cancer Eats Eats 380 200 100 300 115 265 Bacon Bacon No No 100 530 583 200 300 53 Bacon Bacon 300 300 600 168 795 963 For each study, complete the following: 1. Is nationality a risk factor for stomach cancer? You may use 2-by-2 tables and calculation of adds ratio to make your assessment 2. Is nationality assaciated with eating bacon? You may use 2-by-2 tables and calculation of adds ratio to make your assessment 3. Fill in the strata-specific (strata by nationality), and crude OR's for both studies 4. Calculate the M-H (Mantel-jasnssell OR's for each study 5. In study 1, is nationality a confaunder of the relationship between eating bacon and stomach cancer? Explain your answer. In study 2, is nationality a confounder of the relationship between eating bacon and stomach cancer? Explain your answer. 6. How was the data "fixed in Study 2 relative to Study 1, so that nationality wauld no longer be a confounder? Specifically, what association between two things was removed in Study 2 as compared to Study 1? Show that this association was, in fact, removed. Hint: calculate an OR between these twa things Consider the fallowing two hypothetical case-control studies (Fake data), each studying the relationship between eating bacon and stomach cancer stratified by nationality. Complete questions after presentation of studies STUDY 1 JAPANESE AMERICAN Stomach No Stomach No Cancer Cancer Cancer Cancer Eats Eats 200 100 300 115 265 380 Bacon Bacon No No 100 200 300 20 200 220 Bacon Bacon 135 465 600 300 300 600 STUDY 2 JAPANESE AMERICAN No Stomach Stomach No Cancer Cancer Cancer Cancer Eats Eats 380 200 100 300 115 265 Bacon Bacon No No 100 530 583 200 300 53 Bacon Bacon 300 300 600 168 795 963 For each study, complete the following: 1. Is nationality a risk factor for stomach cancer? You may use 2-by-2 tables and calculation of adds ratio to make your assessment 2. Is nationality assaciated with eating bacon? You may use 2-by-2 tables and calculation of adds ratio to make your assessment 3. Fill in the strata-specific (strata by nationality), and crude OR's for both studies 4. Calculate the M-H (Mantel-jasnssell OR's for each study 5. In study 1, is nationality a confaunder of the relationship between eating bacon and stomach cancer? Explain your answer. In study 2, is nationality a confounder of the relationship between eating bacon and stomach cancer? Explain your answer. 6. How was the data "fixed in Study 2 relative to Study 1, so that nationality wauld no longer be a confounder? Specifically, what association between two things was removed in Study 2 as compared to Study 1? Show that this association was, in fact, removed. Hint: calculate an OR between these twa things
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
