Consider the first two steps from the PrOACT framework. What is a key problem faced by Dave Armstrong ? Given the assessment of Dave from the facts in the case, what might be his key objectives (list 4 of them) as he confronts his employment decision? The key here is to get inside Dave's head: though limited, do facts in the case suggest anything about what his preferences are or should be? Consider both pecuniary and non-pecuniary goals, and consider the other people mentioned in the case.

Describe Dave's 3 alternative solutions ("A" in PrOACT). Given each of the aforementioned objectives, how might Dave "score" each alternative ("C" in PrOACT)?