Consider the following case and explain why the case should or should not be dismissed.

Jeannie and Jim Khamee own a laundromat in State A$.$ One day, Jim was working on a dryer and had to remove the drum. When he replaced it$,$ he accidentally left a small screwdriver inside. That evening, Grace, a resident in a nearby border city of State B$,$ came in and was in a hurry. She used the dryer on the high$-$heat setting, hoping to speed up the drying of her clothes, but did not notice the screwdriver in the dryer. When she reached in to pull out her clothing, she wrapped her hand around the screwdriver, suffering third$-$degree burns on her palm. When she burned her hand, she jumped back and fell, striking her head on the floor. She went home, but a few hours later went to a hospital in State B$.$ She was diagnosed as having a traumatic brain injury.

Grace was a commercial artist, and the injuries prevented her from a full return to work for more than a year. Fifteen months after the accident, Grace was introduced to the laundromat$$s owners in a social setting. She told them what had happened. They expressed their condolences but offered no more information. They did offer to help with some of the medical bills, because the injuries occurred on their property. They told Grace that they would do what they could, but that they had carried no liability insurance on the property at the time of the accident. A few weeks later, Grace provided them with the remaining unpaid medical bills of $$2,500,$ along with documentation of bills she had paid personally and through health insurance. The amount was more than $$37,000.$ Grace had also lost income and suffered permanent scarring.