Question: Consider the following three statements: I.The fact that the New York Times held in its possession for three months at least some of the material

Consider the following three statements:

I.The fact that the New York Times held in its possession for three months at least some of the material it now wants to publish cuts against its argument that no delay is warranted while a proper trial can be commenced at the district court level.

II.It is at least possible that the publication of some material by the New York Times in this case might actually harm American soldiers abroad.

III.The public is not entitled to know more about the conduct of war, or about foreign policy in general, than the Executive Branch thinks it proper for the public to know.

Which of the preceding statements is, or are, consistent with Justice Blackmun's dissent in New York Times v. U.S.?

Statements I and II only.

Statements I, II and III.

Statements II and III only.

Statement II only.

Statement I only.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Law Questions!