Consider the U$.$S$.$ Supreme Court's holdings $($decisions$)$ in Gibbons v$.$ Ogden $(1824)$ and Wickar Filburn $(1942).$ With respect to the degree of proof of the intrastate commercial activity's impac interstate commerce that the government must show, which of the following statements is corre

Wickard v$.$ Filburn increased the degree of such proof that the government must show beyond $t1$ required by Gibbons v$.$ Ogden, meaning after Wickard v$.$ Filbura, the government must offer $m$ proof of the intrastate commercial activity's impact upon interstate commerce.

Wickard v$.$ Filburn decreased the degree of such proof that the government must show from th required by Gibbons v$.$ Ogden, meaning after Wickard v$.$ Filburn, the government must offer le of the intrastate commercial activity's impact upon interstate commerce.

I have no idea: All I remember is that Great American Ball Park in Cincinnati is the only Maj Baseball park where a player can hit a homerun out$-$of$-$state. What does this have to do with $1$ anyway?

I have no idea: All I remember is the old professor said something about barndoors getting $b$ and he seemed a little bit excited about it $($actually$,$ he got a lot bit excited about it$).$ Weird.