constitucional law, chapter 17. can you please answer the sub-part

1. Justice Douglas's opinion for the Court in Griswold v. Connecticut asserts a general right to privacy grounded in the ''penumbras and emanations of the Bill of Rights. Explain his argument. Is it persuasive? Why or why not? What limitations may be imposed on this approach? Do some constitutional provisions more readily lend themselves to this approach than others? Which ones? 2. In Griswold, Justice Goldberg cited the Ninth Amendment as the source of a right to privacy. Is his approach persuasive? Why or why not? How can the language of the Ninth Amendment be read to support Goldberg's claim? In your view, who is responsible for determining the existence of others retained by the people? Should the Court identify these rights? If so, can you articulate a constitutional theory to support your position? 3. Has the Court's reaffirmation of the core of Roe v. Wade created a precedent that is too late to be disturbed? What weight should be attached to Justice Cardozo's view, as endorsed and explained by Justice O'Connor's opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, that the Court's work would suffer if it eyed each issue afresh in every case that raised it"? Has the "undue burden" test provided a workable standard that satisfies concerns about the Court's abortion jurisprudence? 4. In Texas v. Lawrence, Justice Kennedy sought to illuminate the issues in the case by drawing attention to a parallel case in Northern Ireland decided by the European Court of Human Rights. In your opinion, is it appropriate for the Court to utilize foreign cases in its interpretation of U.S. law? Why or why not