Constructive Eviction is defined by Cornell University as an eviction that "occ landlord does not physically or legally evict a tenant, but takes actions that interfere wi tenant's use and enjoyment of the premises significantly. Constructive eviction can occ result of the landlord's breach of the implied covenant of quiet enjoyment if (1) the land substantially interferes with the tenant's use and enjoyment of the premises by his actio failure to act to resolve a problem; (2) the tenant gives the landlord notice of the proble landlord fails to respond and resolve the problem; and (3) the tenant vacates the premis reasonable amount of time after the landlord fails to resolve the problem." This is the of principles to me; it states that if the landlord doesn't provide a suitable place to live doesn't destroy it during occupancy, the tenant must complete the contract. However i something vital to tenancy is broken and isn't fixed in a timely manner, causes the tena move out, they have just completed what's known as a Constructive Eviction