Context and transparency really play key roles in assessing the reliability of information. I particularly agree with your point about the importance of understanding how figures are calculated to gauge a report's credibility. Given the uncertainty surrounding the potential financial impact on Central City, how do you propose the auditors incorporate these differing estimates into their assessment of the contingent liability? Would you advocate for a conservative approach that prioritizes the higher end of the attorney's estimate, or do you see value in considering a broader range of possibilities to reflect the inherent uncertainty in the situation