Correct the paragraphs presented in part A and part B$.$ Use the proofreading checklist in Exhibit $11-4.$

A$.$

The governments' first witness at Bean's sentencing were the DEA Task Force Officer Tony silva. He testifies that in his debriefing Luiz had told him about four separate marijuana $$grows$$ in which Luiz had participated. The first was in $1986$ In Tress, Texas: this $$grow$$ produced $700$ marijuana plants. The second was in $1987$ in the Tonto wilderness; and it produced approximately $1500$ marijuana plants. The third $$grow$$ was in $1988$ in sies Colorado and they produced approximately $900$ marijuana plants. The final $$grow$$ was in $1991,$ also at the Sies site. Before the plants in this grow had been harveted, a Colorado State Police aircraft was spotted doing a $$flyover$$ of the property. This prompted Luiz to completely destroy the crop, only fifty two plants were seized. As they were seized the officers noted that two or three plants were in a single grow site. Approximately $1,000$grow holes,$$ with sprinkler heads connected to an extensive irritation system, were found another one thousand uninstalled sprinkler heads, two water tanks and fertilizer also was found on the property.

B$.$

The trial court sentenced smith well within the statutory limits$.$ Therefore the sentence is legal. The record thoroughly, clearly and positively shows that smith and his attorney have ample time to thoroughly review Smiths' sentence report prior to sentencing$.$ They did so and had: $$no problems with it$.$ It is shown by the record that Smith never appealed his conviction or sentence. His section $2255$ Motion were his first and only attempt to challenge his sentence. Any objections to the sentence report as submitted were clearly waived by Smith. The defendant have the responsibility to advise the Court of any claimed errors in the sentence report. His failure to voice any objections waive any issue not properly presented. it has been long held by this court that $$Section $2255$ is not available to test the legality of matters which should have been raised on appeal. unless good cause can be shown why a defendant did not appeal or raise a particular issue on appeal; the defendant is barred from raising that issue in a section $2255$ Motion.