could you please help with a problem 18.2

dos Fau rake eno for 260 (Su sell mo PR Coleman Coleman certified that the seeds Dur un 80 percent germination rate. Hart paid for the beans and picked them up from a warehouse in Card, Arkansas. After the seed was transported to Georgia, a sample was submit ted for testing to the Georgia Department of Agriculture When the department reported germination level of only 67 percent, Coleman requested that the seed be retested. The second set of tests reported a germination rate of 65 percent Harte canceled the contract after the second test, and Coleman reclaimed the seed. Hartxought a refund of the money it had paid for the seed, claiming that the soybeans were nonconforming goods. Who wins Jacob Harte Send Co Cirman, 271 Ark. 756, 612 S.W.2d 91. Web 1981 Ark. 18. Lexis 1153 (Supreme Court of Arkansas) (Sa 18.2 Right to Cure Connie R. Grady purchased new Chevrolet Chevette from Al Thompson Chevrolet (Thompson). Grady gave Thompson a down payment on the General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC). Grady del car and financed the remainder of the purchase price through pip picked up the Chevette. The next day, the car broke down and had to be towed back to Thompson. Grady picked up for the repaired car one day later. The car's performance was dar still unsatisfactory in that the engine was hard to start, the transmission slipped, and the brakes had to be pushed to the 71 floor to function. Two weeks later, Grady again returned 57 the Chevette for servicing. When she picked up the car that evening, the engine started, but the engine and brake warn- 18 ing lights came on. This pattern of malfunction and repair continued for another two months. Grady wrote a letter to Thompson, revoking the sale. Thompson repossessed the Chevette. GMAC sued Grady to recover its money. Grady sued Thompson to recover her down payment. Thompson In claimed that Grady's suit was barred because the company was of not given adequate opportunity to cure. Who wins? General Motors Acceptance Corp. t. Grady, 27 Ohio App.3d 321, 501 In N.E.2d 68, Web 1985 Ohio App. Lexis 10353 (Court of Appeals of Ohio) ag w 8.3 Right to Resell Goods Meuser Material & Equipment we Company (Meuser) was a dealer in construction equipment. leuser entered into an agreement with Joe McMillan for T sale of a bulldozer to McMillan. The agreement called W Meuser to deliver the bulldozer to McMillan's residence Greeley, Colorado. McMillan paid Meuser with a check. M 65 of we art res ed dos Fau rake eno for 260 (Su sell mo PR Coleman Coleman certified that the seeds Dur un 80 percent germination rate. Hart paid for the beans and picked them up from a warehouse in Card, Arkansas. After the seed was transported to Georgia, a sample was submit ted for testing to the Georgia Department of Agriculture When the department reported germination level of only 67 percent, Coleman requested that the seed be retested. The second set of tests reported a germination rate of 65 percent Harte canceled the contract after the second test, and Coleman reclaimed the seed. Hartxought a refund of the money it had paid for the seed, claiming that the soybeans were nonconforming goods. Who wins Jacob Harte Send Co Cirman, 271 Ark. 756, 612 S.W.2d 91. Web 1981 Ark. 18. Lexis 1153 (Supreme Court of Arkansas) (Sa 18.2 Right to Cure Connie R. Grady purchased new Chevrolet Chevette from Al Thompson Chevrolet (Thompson). Grady gave Thompson a down payment on the General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC). Grady del car and financed the remainder of the purchase price through pip picked up the Chevette. The next day, the car broke down and had to be towed back to Thompson. Grady picked up for the repaired car one day later. The car's performance was dar still unsatisfactory in that the engine was hard to start, the transmission slipped, and the brakes had to be pushed to the 71 floor to function. Two weeks later, Grady again returned 57 the Chevette for servicing. When she picked up the car that evening, the engine started, but the engine and brake warn- 18 ing lights came on. This pattern of malfunction and repair continued for another two months. Grady wrote a letter to Thompson, revoking the sale. Thompson repossessed the Chevette. GMAC sued Grady to recover its money. Grady sued Thompson to recover her down payment. Thompson In claimed that Grady's suit was barred because the company was of not given adequate opportunity to cure. Who wins? General Motors Acceptance Corp. t. Grady, 27 Ohio App.3d 321, 501 In N.E.2d 68, Web 1985 Ohio App. Lexis 10353 (Court of Appeals of Ohio) ag w 8.3 Right to Resell Goods Meuser Material & Equipment we Company (Meuser) was a dealer in construction equipment. leuser entered into an agreement with Joe McMillan for T sale of a bulldozer to McMillan. The agreement called W Meuser to deliver the bulldozer to McMillan's residence Greeley, Colorado. McMillan paid Meuser with a check. M 65 of we art res ed