could you write a 3-paragraph response 200 words for; the advantages and disadvantages of Mr. big technique in Canada if it should be used, and if Burns and Rafay are innocent?

some of my opinions;I believe Burns and Bafay are gulty despite their claims that they "falsely confessed to the murders for fear the officers posing as criminals would Kill them if they said they did not commit the crimes" he laid back demeanor that Burns and masy both inhibited while trying to impress Mr. Big demonstrated that they were not afraid of being hilled", as they put it, or physical injury. I also noted that in the documentary, while burns and Profay were explaining their crimes, there was no inconsistensies in their stories and they both calmly and mutually agreed on everything that was said, If they were lying about their confessiong

Some aduantoges of the Mr. Big technique are, when thers minimal taggible evidence, lan enforcement can pinpoint suspects and use this technique to see if they are guilty or not. Another advantage is that they can more easily gain the trust of a suspect this way rather then use a traditional interrogation method, Also, the suspect may willingly volunteer more information this way in contrat to when they have their guard up during interrogation and they want to offer a little information al possible. Some potentiall problems with this technique ire the risin of creeting pressure which may lead to a faise curtession where the suspect feels coerced into doing so. Additionally, lawyer: several factors of the aleged confession by claiming their dient wis pressured, had their legal rights violated, etc.and the techniques shouldn't be used