create two vocabulary words and a hot question from the following: Marbury v. Madison: Judicial Review and Its Impact Instructions: Read the document excerpts below carefully. Then answer the 20 multiple-choice questions that follow. Each question can be answered by referring to the excerpts. Document Excerpts Excerpt 1: From Chief Justice John Marshall's Opinion in Marbury v. Madison (1803): "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each. So if a law be in opposition to the Constitution; if both the law and the Constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the Constitution; or conformably to the Constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty. Excerpt 2: From Federalist No. 78 by Alexander Hamilton: "The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between