creative a response to this statement People often choose alternative dispute resolution (ADR) over court for its cost-effectiveness and speed. ADR processes are generally less expensive and can resolve disputes more quickly than litigation, which may drag on for months or years. Additionally, ADR offers flexibility in procedures and scheduling, allowing parties to tailor the process to their needs. Confidentiality is another significant factor, as ADR typically keeps sensitive information private, which can be crucial for individuals and businesses. Furthermore, methods like mediation focus on collaboration, helping to preserve relationships that might suffer in an adversarial court setting. Among the various methods of ADR, mediation and arbitration stand out. Mediation involves a neutral third party facilitating discussions to help the parties find common ground, promoting cooperation and more satisfactory outcomes. Arbitration, on the other hand, is more formal and involves an arbitrator making a binding decision based on presented evidence. Collaborative law is another appealing method, where both parties and their lawyers work together to reach a settlement without resorting to court. Each of these approaches offers unique benefits that make them attractive alternatives to traditional litigation. I)ADR is better for smaller disputes a